• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

SEC Sentinel

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe

The SEC’s Security-Based Swap “Substituted Compliance” Regime

August 12, 2025 Topic(s): Cross-Border; Crypto / Digital Assets

Foreign security-based swap dealers (SBSDs) and major security-based swap participants (SBSPs) may satisfy specified U.S. rules by complying with comparable home-country requirements—but only if the SEC has issued an order expressly allowing it. But substituted compliance does not mean free pass.

Because many conditions are cross-referenced (e.g., capital, recordkeeping, and reporting), a single breach of a substituted foreign requirement can simultaneously violate multiple Exchange Act provisions—and instantly revoke the ability to rely on substituted compliance.

Why It Matters Now

Cross-border SBS activity—and especially digital-asset trading—continues to surge; registered SBS entities already rely on SEC substituted-compliance orders, and more are expected to follow.

Regulatory Climate: Scrutiny Is Rising

  • The SEC’s Division of Examinations flagged substituted compliance as a 2025 priority.
  • The Enforcement Division brought its first stand-alone substituted-compliance case in August 2025, signaling zero tolerance for lapses.
  • The CFTC has adopted parallel procedures but pledges greater deference to foreign regulators, in contrast to the SEC’s hands-on approach.

Key Compliance Imperatives

  • Master every condition in the SEC order—no exceptions.
  • Treat foreign rules as if they were U.S. law; noncompliance abroad equals a U.S. violation.
  • Maintain ironclad records ready for on-the-spot production during SEC exams.
  • Keep open, proactive lines of communication with both U.S. and home regulators.

Practical Tips for In-House and Outside Counsel

  • Run periodic gap analyses comparing U.S. and foreign requirements.
  • Stress-test controls surrounding capital calculations, margin, and record retention.
  • Document remediation of any foreign regulator findings before the SEC comes knocking.

The bottom line is that substituted compliance streamlines cross-border SBS operations but invites heightened oversight.  Firms that rigorously police their dual obligations will preserve the benefits of this opportunity.

For deeper analysis, see the full article here.

For more information or to discuss with a Gibson Dunn attorney, please click here.
Share:

Primary Sidebar

Gibson Dunn Client Alerts, Articles, and Webcasts

Editors

Osman Nawaz

David Woodcock

Topics

Asset Management / Investment Management

Broker Dealers

Cross-Border

Crypto / Digital Assets

Enforcement Policies

Financial Reporting and Disclosures

Insider Trading

Offering Frauds

SEC Operations

Securities Regulation

Useful Links

  • SEC Enforcement
  • SEC Enforcement Manual
  • SEC Historical Society
  • Association of Securities & Exchange Commission Alumni
  • FINRA Enforcement
  • CFTC Enforcement
  • PCAOB Enforcement
  • NFA Enforcement
  • NASAA Enforcement
  • Gibson Dunn Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.